A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, adored by little statesmen and philosophers and divines. With consistency a great soul has simply nothing to do. He may as well concern himself with his shadow on the wall. Speak what you think now in hard words, and to-morrow speak what to-morrow thinks in hard words again, though it contradict every thing you said to-day. — 'Ah, so you shall be sure to be misunderstood.' — Is it so bad, then, to be misunderstood? Pythagoras was misunderstood, and Socrates, and Jesus, and Luther, and Copernicus, and Galileo, and Newton, and every pure and wise spirit that ever took flesh. To be great is to be misunderstood.

--Ralph Waldo Emerson

Thursday, June 23, 2011

Quotes Index

What can I say? I like being organized. Here is a list of all of the quotes I've posted on here, sorted based on the originator of the quote, in alphabetical order.

Bible

Ralph Waldo Emerson

Boris Pasternak

Portal 2

John Banister Tabb

William Wordsworth

Wednesday, June 22, 2011

JulNo Progress and Quotes!

I had a day off from the library today, so I basically spent my time doing a number of small things. I finished up the backlog of reviews that I needed to write for the books I've read, so those are posted. Then I finished up my calculus studying, and I started reviewing for physics. Yep, I'm counting the review books as things I've read, because I have sunk a lot of time into 'em, and they're books. I'll probably fail even more miserably at the 100 book goal if I don't include them, so there. Nyeh nyeh. ;)

Besides some gross personal things that you--the Internet--don't need to hear about, not much else happened today. What can I say? I'm a slobby, lazy person in the summer. I did, however, spend a bunch of time perusing Bartlett's Familiar Quotations, and that was a lot of fun. It made me remember how much I love Emerson, namely A LOT. But I also found a bunch of quotes I decided to copy down, and some even for my novel!

Probably you know this already, but it's like a tradition with me to do JulNoWriMo every year, each time with a new novel, since 2009. I'm well-aware that I'm a fairly pretentious person. (I love that I say that with a pretentious statement. Heh. :) So it's no understatement when I say that most of what I've written previously for JulNo's and NaNo's has been fairly shitty and overblown. That is why this summer I decided I wanted to do something entirely different. I want to try to break the mold of what I've done before, you know?

But back to Bartlett. I found a ton of quotes that I liked for my novel, to either be integrated or included in the epigraph at the beginning. And, best of all, I found myself a title! Yeah!

I'm going to be calling my piece The Shadow of the Daisy.  It's after the following Wordsworth quote:

Small service is true service while it lasts:
Of humblest friends, bright creature! scorn not one:

The daisy, by the shadow that it casts,

Protects the lingering dewdrop from the sun.
--Wordsworth, To a Child: Written in Her Album
What's best about it is that it actually plays fairly well to one of the main aspects of the novel I'm planning. More details on that in a future blog post, I think. But now for more quotes I liked that are related to the novel!

To different minds, the same world is a hell, and a heaven.
--Ralph W. Emerson, Journal: December 20, 1822
He discovereth deep things out of the darkness, and bringeth out to light the shadow of death.
--Job 12:22
A corner draft fluttered the flame
And the white fever of temptation
Upswept its angel wings that cast
A cruciform shadow.
--Boris Pasternak, Doctor Zhivago
Out of the dusk a shadow,
    Then a spark;
Out of the clouds a silence,
    Then a lark;
Out of the heart a rapture,
    Then a pain;
Out of the dead, cold ashes,
    Life again.
--John Banister Tabb, Evolution
Why, yes, it is a fairly dark piece, why do you ask? Anyway, hope you enjoyed those quotes. If you'll excuse me, I should be getting to bed.

'11 reviews: hot off the presses [2 more]

Note: These are copied out of Word. Any formatting problems are Blogger's fault, not mine.


12. Tale of Two Cities, Charles Dickens 
I’m going to preface this review by saying that I have never liked Dickens. I think his prose is way too florid, and he spends too much time talking about details no one cares about. Coming from the queen of overwriting and wordiness, that’s saying something. However, I felt jipped about not being assigned to read this book during the school year, and, seeing as it is a great classic, I decided to give Dickens a chance to redeem himself. I joined a group that was reading this for their choice book (which I ultimately regretted because my group sucked, but never mind that). 
Tale of Two Cities is a novel of epic scope. As it follows the fates of all of its characters, it also seems to hold the fate of two whole countries—Britain and France—in the balance. Plus, it’s against the backdrop of the French Revolution, which is one of my favorite historical periods. However, besides the overarching story of history, Tale also follows the fate of a large ensemble cast of characters too large to get into in this review. If there was anything great about this novel, it was the sheer diversity and depth to its characters, which almost compensates for the shitty prose style. 
The two main characters are Charles Darnay and Sidney Carton, the first a Frenchman, the latter an Englishman; both look remarkably alike, and yet they are starkly different people. Still, they share a love for one Lucie Mannette, the daughter of a long-time prisoner in the Bastille. That is the driving force behind most of their actions, which I won’t really get into too much because the plot is fairly well-known to most—and if you don’t know it, you should really read the book, because that is one of the other main attractions to reading it. 
Overall, I’d recommend reading an abridged version if you don’t want to spend a ton of time on this book, because again, the prose style is lurid and gross. It’s the characters (with the exception of Darnay and Lucie, who are as dull as pasteboard) and the plot that make it a worthwhile read. Look out for Madame Defarge; she’s my absolute favorite, and she is definitely the strongest female character in my book. 
(Tee hee, see what I did there?)

13. Where Angels Fear to Tread, E. M. Forster 
I’ve been in love with E.M. Forster since reading Howard’s End. The prose style is brilliant, doing a great job of balancing a healthy amount of detail and description with actually propelling the plot forward. More than that, I love his characters, and I love the social commentary he does on class and love and idealism and just British-ness in general. He ranks up there with Jane Austen and Charlotte Bronte as one of my favorite (classics) authors. :) 
The novel is essentially a family drama, revolving around the Herritons: Mrs. Herriton, a sharp-witted woman who channels her intelligence towards making their family as middle-class as possible; Harriet, her spinster daughter, who is obnoxious, shrewish and moralistic; Phillip, her bachelor son, who is best described as a sort of detached, foppish intellectual with a love for Italy; and finally, the widowed Lilia Herriton, Mrs. Herriton’s daughter-in-law and the shame of the family. Lilia is a hopelessly silly and free-spirited woman who does not fit the oppressive Herriton middle-class-ish-ness, which worries the family because her ~scandalous behavior with men could easily reflect on them and Lilia’s daughter. In order to get her out of the way, the family packs Lilia off with one Caroline Abbott, who requires a companion on her trip to Italy. And all is well for the family for a time; from Lilia’s letters back, they even get the impression that she is “improving”. However, suddenly, without warning, the family receives word that Lilia plans to marry an Italian. Chaos ensues as the Herritons scramble to go to Italy and stop that rash, imprudent marriage in its tracks. 
I did love this piece by Forster, as I expected to. It’s not as refined in its style as Howard’s End was, but I think he wrote this earlier, so that is fine in my mind. The one problem with it, of course, is inherent in almost all of Forster’s pieces: it’s annoyingly depressing. When the ending came, I wanted to throw my Kindle at the wall, I was that frustrated with two annoyingly stupid characters. (Luckily, I didn’t, as Kindles are expensive, you know.) 
Ultimately, though, I think that giving the piece such a frustrating ending probably lent it more meaning than if it had had a happy ending. Thus, if you like this kind of thing, with hilariously absurd situations and social commentary on rigidity and class, I highly recommend Where Angels Fear to Tread. It’s a brilliant read.

Tuesday, June 21, 2011

'11 reviews: finally wiping out the backlog of reviews (last 2)

Note: As usual, copy-pasted. Any problems with formatting...blame Blogger, bitte.

10. Daisy Miller, Henry James
Henry James was one of those crazy ex-patriots like T.S. Eliot who left the United States to live in Europe. This makes a very clear impact on the themes and stuff of Daisy Miller.
The main character is a man named Winterbourne; like James, he used to live in the U.S., but also like James, he has been living in Europe so long that he’s almost forgotten how Americans behave. Enter Daisy Miller, a beautiful, exuberant American girl. She catches his interest and sparks his imagination, and they enter into a kind of unconventional courtship. However, their relationship is soon compromised by Daisy’s outrageously (for the times, anyway…) flirtatious manner towards other men, which shocks the elite of Europe and other American ex-patriots. Drama ensues as she is gradually shunned from all respectable society. I feel like I’m always saying “drama ensues”, ha ha—I guess it’s a common plot thread.
Essentially, this is a novella about manners, much in the same vein as Edith Wharton. It’s kind of funny, because Daisy Miller is so similar to Wharton’s House of Mirth in terms of the whole “flirty with men, unjustly shunned by society” theme, and yet despite James and Wharton being BFFs, they hated each other’s work.
Anyway, I just kinda like history and like stuff that looks at how societal mores have changed over time and such, but that sort of thing can also be incredibly depressing. I do recommend Daisy Miller, but I don’t think it’s necessarily to everyone’s taste.

11. Looking for Alaska, John Green
Recently, I had the following exchange with a friend.

FRIEND: excitedly blah blah blah, John Green, blah blah blah…
ME: …who’s John Green?
FRIEND: stops for a moment to give me an incredulous look What? You’ve never read John Green?!
ME: …um, no.
FRIEND: OMG YOU NEED TO RIGHT NOW BLAH BLAH BLAH…

So I begged my dad to buy me a copy of Looking for Alaska, and he agreed. I was originally going to read it on the plane to *college visiting* and all that, but I really wanted to try it out.
Looking for Alaska begins with teenager Miles Halter leaving home to go to the Culver Creek Prep School in Alabama. His purpose for leaving? To seek the “Great Perhaps”, as described by the last words of poet François Rabelais. Something to note about Miles: his hobby is memorizing the last words of famous people.
When he arrives at Culver Creek, the first acquaintances he makes are the most important in shaping his future friendships—his roommate, Chip Martin (nicknamed “the Colonel”), and the beautiful, enigmatic Alaska Young down the hall. Through his various new experiences at school, ranging from the academic (his religious studies class), to the more personal (forming meaningful relationships, smoking, getting drunk, having his first sexual encounter, and ultimately falling in love), we follow along for the ride as Miles dives headfirst into finding his Great Perhaps and, in the process, growing up and maturing.
I thought this was an interesting book, but to me, it falls into the same category as Catcher in the Rye (for they are very similar thematically, in some ways): well-written, engaging, and verging on the profound—but at the end of the day, not the book for me. Though I did enjoy the ride, I never was able to fully get into Miles’s head and really feel for the characters. Maybe I’m just a prude, but I never saw the need for all the completely illegal drug stuff the characters did throughout the book, in terms of drinking and smoking and stuff, and I didn’t really like the implication that everyone did those things at the school. :/ I do think that John Green does a good job of showing that he, as the author, feels the kids are being reckless and irresponsible, especially given the ending. It wasn’t the best book I’ve ever read, but it certainly keeps you interested and reading. I do think I’ll be reading more John Green, though, so stay tuned for that. ;)

Books Read: An Index Post

This is my index post for all of the books I've read. I figure the end of high school is like the end of an era and deserves something special to mark it.

2011 
(Note: This year was the one I decided to attempt the 100 book challenge. So far, I've been failing miserably at it. I guess I don't read as much as I used to.)
1. Agnes Gray, Anne Bronte (review)
2. A Confederacy of Dunces, John Kennedy Toole (review)
3. Their Eyes Were Watching God, Zora Neale Hurston (review)
4. Master Harold...and the Boys, Athol Fugard (review)
5. Six Characters in Search of an Author, Luigi Pirandello (review)
6. True West, Sam Shepard (review)
7. Translations, Brian Friel (review)
8. A Simple Soul, Gustave Flaubert (review)
9. The Professor, Charlotte Bronte (review)
10. Daisy Miller, Henry James (review)
11. Looking for Alaska, John Green (review)
12. Tale of Two Cities, Charles Dickens (review)
13. Where Angels Fear to Tread, E.M. Forster (review)
13.5 Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, J.K. Rowling (reread)
14. Cracking the AP Calculus AB/BC Exams, Princeton Review (why the hell would I review this?!)

Currently reading:
Villette (Charlotte Bronte), This Side of Paradise (F. Scott Fitzgerald), Thud! (Terry Pratchett)

Monday, June 20, 2011

List of things

So I have something to post. Yay? Anyway, here's a list of things I'm working on at the moment.
  1. Placement tests
    Seriously, I've been such a procrastinator on this. Explanation: the university I'm going to in the fall requires us to take placement exams in math, physics, and writing so they can put us into something remedial if we stink or, best case scenario, we get to test out of stuff! I'm hoping to do really well on the math, and I'm hoping to not utterly fail the physics. Oh, and I'm going to take the optional placement exam for chemistry so I can hopefully test into organic chemistry!
    Of course, since only about a maximum of 10 people test out in each category each year, it's pretty stiff competition, so *crosses fingers*.
  2. JulNo Outline
    I've been sitting on this way too long, but I started my outline last night. It's going, um, okay. I think I have an overall idea where everything is going; it's just the nitty-gritty that's eluding me.
  3. Library work
    I seriously have no idea why I decided to intern there this summer. I don't need the service, and it's kind of exhausting. I'm basically going in almost every day. I guess it counts as my summer job, except without the monetary benefit.
  4. Reading books
    I'm so hopelessly behind on my 100 books thing, it's not even funny. At the moment, I'm reading Charlotte Bronte's Villette on my Kindle, and all the French is starting to piss me off and make me wish I'd taken that instead of German. I've also downloaded some other stuff, though, like Prisoner of Zenda and Vanity Fair (which are, hopefully, completely in English).
    Also, I'm planning on taking some time to read a bunch of Shakespearean plays. I mean, it's one thing to blame my school for not having any Shakespeare, but I've graduated high school. It's entirely on my own shoulders to learn now. Not that it wasn't before; it's just more clear now that that's the case.
Just a snippet of what's going on with me at the moment. Now, if you'll excuse me, I've got to get my ass in gear on some calculus.

Sunday, June 19, 2011

On Portal 2 and my nearly non-existent gaming cred

It's been a while now, but Hank Green of the Vlogbrothers recently finished Portal 2 on his gaming channel. I highly recommend watching Hank play both Portal and Portal 2; both are brilliant.

Side note: I actually prefer Hank's gaming channel to the main Vlogbrothers channel because it's more...spontaneous, maybe? I feel like the Vlogbrothers try a little too hard to be profound sometimes. (Maybe that's projection on my part. :D)



I've never really been much of a gamer. My eye-hand coordination leaves a lot to be desired, and I've never really had the time (or, for that matter, the spare cash) necessary to really get into gaming. Mostly, though, I just like watching people play games than actually playing them. That possibly says something profound about me, about me being a spectator who narrates life as a story rather than living it like Andrew on Buffy (speaking of, I just finished S7! :D), but that's probably a subject for another blog post.

And wow. I was so...well, touched by the end of Portal 2. The turret opera was so beautiful and appropriate, and tears were literally streaming down my cheeks, about as much as I bawled at the end of Toy Story 3. That's saying something. And SPAAAAACE. So epic.

Is that weird? Is it weird that a game could be so profound? It must be, to you. Let me give an example.

Cave Johnson: When life gives you lemons? Don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back! Get mad! I don't want your damn lemons! What am I supposed to do with these? Demand to see life's manager! Make life rue the day it thought it could give Cave Johnson lemons! Do you know who I am? I'm the man who's going to burn your house down! With the lemons! I'm going to get my engineers to invent a combustible lemon that burns your house down!

GLaDOS: Burning people! He says what we're all thinking!

That is life. Life is filled with pain and suffering. Hell, life is pain--well, most of the time, anyway. I've realized that recently. Nihilism suggests that the only way to not feel that pain anymore is to die. But then why do we live? Why do we keep going despite that?

Cave Johnson has the answer, a semi-existentialist answer: the point to life is to take all that pain and give it the middle finger, to derive satisfaction from the rejection of pain.

AND I'm being way too pretentiously profound again. I could probably think of more ponderings along those lines, but for now, that's all I've got.